Portfolio Insurance: Designing an Ethical Asset Protection Plan

Almost everybody has some form of insurance policy in their life: whether it's car, home, renters, disability, life, business, general liability, or any other type of insurance, almost everybody has at least several, and for good reason -- insurance mitigates risk, in the event of unforeseen or unavoidable occurrences in life. But how many people have an insurance policy that covers their general portfolio against loss? Surprisingly, very few individuals take the time to consider and establish an asset protection plan, which serves to insure their assets against the unforeseen. I recently read an excellent book on this topic, titled Asset Protection : Concepts and Strategies for Protecting Your Wealth, which goes into great detail about the ethics of asset protection, as well as separates the strategies that actually work in the real world from those that people usually think of, like elaborate off-shore trust accounts that aren't actually effective.

Part of what I enjoyed about this particular book is that the author takes great care to examine the ethics of using asset protection as an insurance policy. For example, consider two scenarios:

  • Due to negligent driving on your part, you cause a collision which causes serious bodily harm to someone else, and they sue you for damages related to medical bills and lost wages. You are completely at fault, and the injured party should be entitled to collecting from you to pay their bills. In this instance, it would not be moral for your asset protection plan to try to hide assets from the injured party, as your negligence caused the injury. However, a good umbrella insurance policy might be helpful in this instance.
  • You own a rental house, and your renter invites some friends over; in the course of their visit, they manage to break their leg in the back yard of your rental house, and sue you for damages. In this instance, depending on the circumstances, you may be liable for some damages -- but if anything, they should be contained to the assets of the rental property, and not your personal retirement funds.

If the difference of the two examples is not immediately apparent, consider that in the first instance, your negligent behavior was the direct cause for injury to another party; in the second case, as long as the property was generally in repair, someone got injured and is looking to collect from the incident. You have a claim to moral defensibility in the second instance, but not the first. A subtle difference, perhaps, but a very important moral distinction none the less. Asset protection should be an ethical process, designed to protect you from unscrupulously litigious individuals who are trying to deprive you of your assets.

In addition, the main goal of a proper asset protection plan shouldn't be to prevent a judgment in court -- it should be to prevent being sued in the first place. Even if you are absolutely innocent, there are always court fees that you will have to pay to prove your innocence; avoiding the whole process before it starts is the best defense you can have. When determining whether to accept a case to sue you, a lawyer will generally run a basic background check on any public assets that you might have. If your asset protection plan is properly set up, anything of value that you own or control will be sheltered by layers of corporations, making it seem as if you don't actually have anything. As such, most lawyers will not take the case on a contingency -- in other words, they will demand money up front -- because they don't think they will be able to successfully collect a judgment against you. This in turn can dissuade many frivolous lawsuits before they even happen, as you are not an easy mark.

There are many good reasons to establish an asset protection plan for your portfolio, and the most compelling reason is that you just don't have control over who can sue you; and, in our extremely litigious society, the risks of losing your entire portfolio to a lawsuit becomes more and more likely. By properly isolating various portions of your assets from each other, and obfuscating your real net worth, you provide a great deal of insurance to protect yourself from any financial accidents that might occur in your life.

I hope you never have to experience getting sued, but in reality a large percentage of people do get sued at some point in their life, and you need to have a strategy in place long before this happens if you want to protect yourself. If you are interested in reading more about this topic, I highly recommend the book Asset Protection : Concepts and Strategies for Protecting Your Wealth -- not only does it go over the ethical and social considerations of asset management, but it also examines in great detail the specific strategies and layers of protection you can implement in order to protect your own assets from potential litigations.

Buy me a coffee
Send this article to a friend
share this
content


Book Review: Cashflow Quadrant, by Robert Kiyosaki

This is one of those books that I have read at least a dozen times, and every time I read it again I learn something new. This book covers the four main ways of earning income: working for someone else (an employee), working for yourself (self-employed), owning a successful business (a business owner), and investing in other successful businesses (an investor). The first two are active means of income; in other words, they require you to continue devoting time and energy into the equation in order to make money. If you stop working, the paychecks will stop coming. The latter two are passive, in that once you invest the time or money initially, they continue to pay you day in and day out. Most successful people choose to create investment vehicles which continue to grow without their continued involvement, as it leaves them more free time to find new investments. Vast fortunes can be made in any of the quadrants, but most successful people end up as business owners and/or investors.

One thing I like about this book is that is makes a clear distinction between people who are self-employed, and people who own a business. Many people think they own a business, but are actually self-employed. A common example of self-employment is a doctor who has clients, and bills them for visits. If the doctor were to go on vacation, he wouldn't be meeting with patients, and thus he wouldn't be making any money. Though he is operating as a business, the doctor is actually self-employed, as his income depends on his own work. If he stops working, his business will grind to a halt. Compare this with someone who employs doctors and nurses and administrative staff, provides an office, and hires someone to manage all his personnel. The day-to-day operations of the business are no longer in the hands of the business owner; his business will continue to make money whether he works or not. As long as he hires competent talent, he can go on vacation, or focus on other ventures, while his doctor's office business continues to thrive, and even grow without his presence. He is now a businessowner-- he makes money from the company whether he chooses to work there or not. Clearly, having income that doesn't depend on your own efforts gives you much more freedom, and allows you to pursue your dreams and passions without having to worry about working for a paycheck just to get by.

This is a must-read book, so go check out a copy from your local library. I received my copy as a gift, and have gotten so much use out of it over the years. Every time I read this book with a slightly different mindset, I continue to learn new ideas that I hadn't thought about the last time I read it. To get more information about this book, view it on Amazon.

Buy me a coffee
Send this article to a friend
share this
content


Search


Disclaimer

The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and are intended for informational purposes only. I welcome your feedback.

© Copyright 2010